If prioritizing comfort in seating design leads to reduced lumbar support, and a chair is designed to maximize comfort without neglecting essential spinal health, then that chair will not prioritize comfort to the detriment of lumbar support.
Which of the following exhibits a parallel structure of reasoning to the argument above?
A) If maximizing seating area in a vehicle reduces individual passenger space, and a vehicle’s design aims for ample seating without compromising individual comfort, then that vehicle’s design will not maximize seating area at the expense of passenger space.
B) If increasing the cushioning of a mattress leads to increased heat retention, and a mattress is engineered for optimal cushioning while addressing temperature regulation, then that mattress’s design will prioritize cushioning even if it compromises temperature control.
C) If utilizing a specific material in furniture construction increases its durability but diminishes its aesthetic appeal, and a piece of furniture is designed to maximize durability without disregarding aesthetic considerations, then that furniture’s design will prioritize the chosen material for its durability over aesthetic factors.
D) If enhancing the adjustability of a desk improves ergonomics but raises the cost of production, and a desk is developed to be highly adjustable without making it unaffordable, then that desk’s design will not prioritize adjustability to the point of becoming excessively expensive.